Comcast screens cheaper than Liberty Media’s Formula One shares on all three valuation measures provided. That gives investors a useful starting point for comparison, but it doesn’t show that either stock is a good buy.
Comcast Corp. (CMCSA) and Liberty Media Corporation Series C Liberty Formula One Common Stock (FWONK) are both in the Communication Services sector and Media & Entertainment industry group. But their businesses and financial profiles differ, so valuation multiples are only part of the picture. At the 2026-10-29 close, CMCSA traded at US$22.27, with a US$76.6B market cap. FWONK traded at US$92.61, with a US$22.8B market cap. Comcast had the lower P/E, PEG and P/B in this snapshot. Those figures don’t establish fair value or capture every difference in growth, risk or business outlook.
Investor takeaway: Comcast looks cheaper on the supplied P/E, PEG and P/B figures. It also has a 6.04% dividend yield, compared with 0.00% for FWONK. But lower multiples and a higher yield don’t prove Comcast is undervalued. FWONK’s higher multiples don’t prove it’s overpriced, either. Investors still need to weigh each company’s prospects and risks.
Stocks in this list
Live snapshots — open any name for the full quote and Wealth Awesome price forecast.
Comcast Corp
CMCSA.US
Communication Services
$22.27
$76.60B
1D
+3.25%
1W
-2.50%
Liberty Media Corporation Series C Liberty Formula One Common Stock
FWONK.US
Communication Services
$92.61
$22.78B
1D
+1.93%
1W
+1.60%
Comcast is lower on all three supplied valuation multiples
CMCSA has a P/E of 6.8, compared with 110.8 for FWONK. Its PEG is 1.16 versus 12.77, and its P/B is 0.85 versus 3.12. On these measures, Comcast screens cheaper. The comparison doesn’t show that either stock is mispriced or predict future returns.
Bull case
Comcast’s P/E of 6.8, PEG of 1.16 and P/B of 0.85 are all below FWONK’s. Its 11.4% TTM ROE and 6.04% dividend yield add context, but neither guarantees future results.
Bear case
The lower multiples don’t explain why the market values Comcast this way. This snapshot can’t tell us whether they reflect business risks or market expectations. Comcast’s analyst consensus is Hold, while FWONK’s is Strong Buy. Those ratings and targets offer context, but they don’t replace independent analysis.
Valuation snapshot: Comcast screens cheaper
All three supplied multiples point in the same direction: Comcast has the lower P/E, PEG and P/B.
| Measure | CMCSA | FWONK |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 6.8 | 110.8 |
| PEG | 1.16 | 12.77 |
| P/B | 0.85 | 3.12 |
Comcast looks cheaper on these measures. That doesn’t prove its shares are undervalued, or that FWONK’s higher multiples aren’t supported by its business outlook. The information here isn’t enough to answer those questions. For company details, see Comcast’s stock page and FWONK’s stock page.
Yield, returns and analyst context
Comcast’s dividend yield is 6.04%, compared with 0.00% for FWONK. TTM ROE is 11.4% for CMCSA and 2.7% for FWONK. These figures describe the snapshot, but they don’t guarantee future dividends or returns.
The analyst consensus is Hold for Comcast and Strong Buy for FWONK. Their respective analyst targets are US$27.98 and US$118.76. Ratings and targets are estimates, not assurances, and they don’t settle whether either stock is fairly valued. The multiples make the comparison clear, but they don’t explain each company’s prospects or the risks investors face.
Best next step
Keep exploring this topic
If you want to go deeper, these are the most useful follow-up pages and tools for this topic.
Broker comparison
Best trading platforms in Canada
Compare $0-commission brokers before you act on a ticker story.
Safe cash
Best GIC rates in Canada
If the story makes you want to de-risk, compare guaranteed rates next.
HISA roundup
Best high-interest savings accounts
Keep dry powder in a no-fee savings account instead of chequing.
TFSA room
Check TFSA contribution room
Shelter the next contribution before you buy.
Wealth Awesome
Timely coverage of Canadian stocks, earnings, dividends, and market movers for DIY investors. Stories are checked against exchange data and public filings.
View Full Profile →✅ Reviewed by Certified Financial Professionals
This content has been reviewed by CFA® charterholders and Certified Financial Planners (CFP®) with over a decade of experience in Canadian financial markets. All information is fact-checked against official Canadian sources and regulations.
Why these credentials matter: CFA® charterholders complete 900+ hours of rigorous study in investment analysis and ethics. CFP® professionals are held to the highest standards of financial planning competency and fiduciary duty in Canada.
⚠️ Professional Disclaimer
This content is for educational purposes only and should not be considered personalized financial advice. While our team brings professional expertise, individual circumstances vary. For personalized guidance, consult with a qualified financial advisor, tax professional, or mortgage specialist.
