
Magna screens cheaper than Dollarama on all three valuation measures in this snapshot. That’s a starting point for comparison, not proof that either stock is undervalued.
Dollarama Inc. (DOL.TO) and Magna International Inc. (MG.TO) share a sector and industry-group classification in the snapshot, but their businesses and financial profiles differ. At the November 9, 2026 adjusted close, Dollarama traded at C$218.08 per share, with a market cap of C$57.8B. Magna traded at C$88.09 per share, with a market cap of C$22.8B. Magna has the lower P/E, PEG and P/B. For more context, see the company pages for Dollarama and Magna International.
Investor takeaway: Magna has the lower readings on all three supplied multiples: a P/E of 20.8 versus 42.7 for Dollarama, a PEG of 0.34 versus 3.01, and a P/B of 1.41 versus 39.72. These figures don’t establish fair value or predict future returns. The snapshot also shows a large gap in return on equity and dividend yield, so consider each company’s business and financial profile alongside the multiples.
Stocks in this list
Live snapshots — open any name for the full quote and Wealth Awesome price forecast.
Dollarama Inc
DOL.TO
Consumer Discretionary
$218.08
$57.83B
1D
+1.20%
1W
+2.87%
Magna International Inc
MG.TO
Consumer Discretionary
$88.09
$22.76B
1D
+0.81%
1W
-3.80%
Magna has the lower reading on all three supplied valuation multiples
Magna’s P/E is 20.8, its PEG is 0.34 and its P/B is 1.41. Dollarama’s figures are 42.7, 3.01 and 39.72, respectively. This compares the multiples in the snapshot; it isn’t a verdict on either stock’s value.
Bull case
Magna’s lower P/E, PEG and P/B, along with its 2.27% dividend yield, may interest investors comparing valuation and income. But these figures alone don’t show whether the shares are attractive.
Bear case
Magna’s trailing-twelve-month ROE is 7.1%, compared with Dollarama’s 93.1%. The lower multiples don’t explain that gap or show whether Magna’s valuation reflects its prospects.
The multiples favour Magna in this snapshot
Magna has the lower figure on each of the three measures. Its P/E of 20.8 is below Dollarama’s 42.7, its PEG of 0.34 is below 3.01, and its P/B of 1.41 is below 39.72. By these measures, Magna screens cheaper. That doesn’t prove it’s undervalued. Multiples are only one part of a comparison and don’t account for differences in business performance, risk or future results on their own.
Returns and dividends add context
The snapshot reports trailing-twelve-month ROE of 7.1% for Magna and 93.1% for Dollarama. Their dividend yields are 2.27% and 0.21%, respectively. These figures describe different aspects of the companies, but don’t explain the valuation gap by themselves. Both stocks have a Strong Sell analyst consensus label and a reported analyst target of C$0.00. The snapshot provides no further detail, so treat these as reported figures, not a complete assessment.
A comparison, not a verdict
The data shows Magna with lower P/E, PEG and P/B readings, but also lower trailing-twelve-month ROE and a higher dividend yield than Dollarama. Magna’s market cap is C$22.8B, compared with C$57.8B for Dollarama. These figures can help guide further research, but the snapshot alone can’t tell you which company is the better investment or whether either share price represents fair value.
Best next step
Keep exploring this topic
If you want to go deeper, these are the most useful follow-up pages and tools for this topic.
Broker comparison
Best trading platforms in Canada
Compare $0-commission brokers before you act on a ticker story.
Safe cash
Best GIC rates in Canada
If the story makes you want to de-risk, compare guaranteed rates next.
HISA roundup
Best high-interest savings accounts
Keep dry powder in a no-fee savings account instead of chequing.
TFSA room
Check TFSA contribution room
Shelter the next contribution before you buy.

Wealth Awesome
Timely coverage of Canadian stocks, earnings, dividends, and market movers for DIY investors. Stories are checked against exchange data and public filings.
View Full Profile →✅ Reviewed by Certified Financial Professionals
This content has been reviewed by CFA® charterholders and Certified Financial Planners (CFP®) with over a decade of experience in Canadian financial markets. All information is fact-checked against official Canadian sources and regulations.
Why these credentials matter: CFA® charterholders complete 900+ hours of rigorous study in investment analysis and ethics. CFP® professionals are held to the highest standards of financial planning competency and fiduciary duty in Canada.
⚠️ Professional Disclaimer
This content is for educational purposes only and should not be considered personalized financial advice. While our team brings professional expertise, individual circumstances vary. For personalized guidance, consult with a qualified financial advisor, tax professional, or mortgage specialist.


