A side-by-side comparison of iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF (XMA) and Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (CPCC) to help Canadian investors make an informed decision.
1-Year Performance
Normalised to 100 at the start — shows relative return over the trailing 12 months.
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Metric | XMA | CPCC |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | +8.07%✓ | +7.02% |
| 1-Day Change | -1.27%✓ | -1.59% |
| 1-Week Change | -5.39% | -3.85%✓ |
| 1-Month Change | -5.33% | -3.97%✓ |
| Current Price | $45.11 | $23.47 |
| AUM | $757M✓ | $111M |
| MER (Expense Ratio) | 0% | — |
| Dividend Yield | 0.39% | — |
| Distribution Frequency | Quarterly | — |
| Inception Date | 2005-12-19 | 2025-12-01 |
| Holdings Count | 10 | 10 |
| MorningStar Rating | ★★★★ | — |
| Category | Natural Resources Equity | Natural Resources Equity |
| Beta | 1.55 | 0.00 |
| 52-Week High | $55.46 | $26.13 |
| 52-Week Low | $34.02 | $17.88 |
| 50-Day MA | $46.30 | $24.25 |
| 200-Day MA | $45.66 | $23.52 |
✓ marks the better value for return/yield/AUM metrics. Lower ✓ for MER.
Annualised Returns
| Period | XMA | CPCC |
|---|---|---|
| YTD | +8.07%✓ | +7.02% |
| 1 Year | +26.37% | — |
| 3 Year | +39.89% | — |
| 5 Year | +23.93% | — |
| 10 Year | +13.67% | — |
| 1Y Volatility | 47.06% | — |
| Sharpe Ratio (3Y) | 1.11 | — |
Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
Top 10 Holdings
| 1 | AEM | Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 14.47% |
| 2 | ABX | Barrick Gold Corp | 10.56% |
| 3 | WPM | Wheaton Precious Metals Corp | 9.62% |
| 4 | FNV | Franco-Nevada Corporation | 7.13% |
| 5 | K | Kinross Gold Corp | 5.13% |
| 6 | NTR | Nutrien Ltd | 5.10% |
| 7 | TECK-B | Teck Resources Limited | 4.30% |
| 8 | FM | First Quantum Minerals Ltd | 3.16% |
| 9 | PAAS | Pan American Silver Corp | 3.08% |
| 10 | LUN | Lundin Mining Corporation | 2.54% |
| 1 | COPX | Global X Copper Miners ETF | 17.22% |
| 2 | FCX | Freeport-McMoran Copper & Gold Inc | 10.38% |
| 3 | TECK-B | Teck Resources Limited | 9.59% |
| 4 | SCCO | Southern Copper Corporation | 9.49% |
| 5 | FM | First Quantum Minerals Ltd | 8.94% |
| 6 | LUN | Lundin Mining Corporation | 8.26% |
| 7 | HBM | HudBay Minerals Inc | 6.59% |
| 8 | IVN | Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. | 5.51% |
| 9 | CS | Capstone Mining Corp | 5.28% |
| 10 | BHP | BHP Group Limited | 4.57% |
Sector Weights
| Sector | XMA | CPCC |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Materials | 98.65% | 99.56% |
| Communication Services | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Consumer Cyclicals | 1.35% | 0.00% |
| Consumer Defensive | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Energy | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Financial Services | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Healthcare | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Industrials | 0.00% | 0.44% |
| Real Estate | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Technology | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Utilities | 0.00% | 0.00% |
About XMA
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF (XMA.TO) is a Canadian-listed ETF traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange. More detailed information will be available soon.
About CPCC
Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (CPCC.TO) is a Canadian-listed ETF traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange. More detailed information will be available soon.
Which ETF is Right for You?
Both XMA and CPCC are listed on Canadian exchanges and accessible through most Canadian brokerages including Questrade, Wealthsimple Trade, TD Direct, and Interactive Brokers.
Based on the available data, XMA scores higher across our tracked metrics including YTD performance, dividend yield, and AUM — though both ETFs warrant individual research before investing.
- Consider your account type (TFSA, RRSP, non-registered) as it can affect dividend taxation.
- Compare management expense ratios (MER) directly on each provider's website.
- Look at average daily trading volume to assess liquidity.
- Review the fund's underlying index and holdings to ensure the exposure matches your goals.
This is not financial advice. Always do your own research or consult a licensed financial advisor before investing.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between XMA and CPCC?
XMA (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF) and CPCC (Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF) are both Canadian-listed ETFs. Key differences include their AUM ($757M vs $111M), dividend yield (0.39% vs N/A), and year-to-date performance (+8.07% vs +7.02%).
Is XMA better than CPCC?
There is no single "better" ETF — it depends on your investment goals. If you prioritise recent performance, XMA has outperformed year-to-date. Always review the fund's prospectus and consider your tax situation.
Can I buy XMA and CPCC on Wealthsimple?
Most Canadian-listed ETFs are available on Wealthsimple Trade commission-free. Both XMA and CPCC should be accessible. Check Wealthsimple's supported tickers list to confirm availability.
7 stocks to buy and hold forever
Complement your ETF portfolio with these proven long-term individual stocks.
Get the FREE Report