TSX open
Loading markets…
Investing

FANG vs VNOM: which stock is the better value?

By Wealth Awesome -
Stocks & ETFs:FANG.USVNOM.US

Follow FANG

Photos provided by Pexels

Diamondback Energy looks cheaper on two of the three valuation measures in this snapshot. That gives it the edge by the majority rule, while Viper Energy has the lower PEG and higher dividend yield.

Diamondback Energy Inc. (FANG) and Viper Energy (VNOM) are both in the energy sector, but their valuation figures differ. At the latest adjusted closes, on November 2, 2026, FANG traded at US$199.74, with a market cap of US$59.4 billion. VNOM traded at US$45.72, with a market cap of US$17.1 billion. Share prices alone don’t show which stock is cheaper, so this comparison looks at the supplied P/E, PEG and P/B figures.

Investor takeaway: FANG has the lower P/E and P/B, while VNOM has the lower PEG. FANG therefore looks cheaper on two of the three measures. That doesn’t prove FANG is undervalued, show which company has better prospects or account for differences between their businesses. Dividend yields and trailing returns on equity add context, but they don’t settle the valuation question.

Stocks in this list

Live snapshots — open any name for the full quote and Wealth Awesome price forecast.

FANG is cheaper on two of three valuation measures

FANG’s P/E is 40.4, compared with 2,384.0 for VNOM. Its P/B is 1.48, versus 1.74 for VNOM. VNOM has the lower PEG at 0.93, compared with 10.36 for FANG. The measures are mixed, but FANG has the lower reading on two of the three. These ratios alone don’t show that either stock is undervalued.

Bull case

FANG’s lower P/E and P/B, along with its 2.06% dividend yield, may appeal to investors comparing these figures. Its trailing ROE is also higher than VNOM’s: 3.5% versus 1.1% in this snapshot.

Bear case

FANG’s PEG of 10.36 is much higher than VNOM’s 0.93, so it doesn’t look cheaper on every measure. Valuation ratios and analyst ratings don’t guarantee future performance.

The valuation picture is mixed

FANG has the lower P/E, at 40.4 compared with VNOM’s 2,384.0, and the lower P/B, at 1.48 versus 1.74. VNOM has the lower PEG, at 0.93 compared with FANG’s 10.36. The supplied measures favour FANG in two of the three comparisons, but the difference is worth keeping in mind. A lower ratio is a relative reading from this snapshot, not proof that a stock is undervalued or the right fit for you. For company details, see Diamondback Energy and Viper Energy.

Yield, returns and analyst context

VNOM’s dividend yield is 5.23%, higher than FANG’s 2.06%. FANG’s trailing ROE is 3.5%, compared with 1.1% for VNOM. Both stocks have a Strong Buy analyst consensus label in the supplied table. The listed analyst targets are US$239.45 for FANG and US$55.20 for VNOM. These figures add context, but they don’t resolve the mixed valuation picture or guarantee an outcome. This is a point-in-time comparison based on adjusted closing prices from November 2, 2026.

Wealth Awesome
Written by

Wealth Awesome

Timely coverage of Canadian stocks, earnings, dividends, and market movers for DIY investors. Stories are checked against exchange data and public filings.

View Full Profile →

✅ Reviewed by Certified Financial Professionals

This content has been reviewed by CFA® charterholders and Certified Financial Planners (CFP®) with over a decade of experience in Canadian financial markets. All information is fact-checked against official Canadian sources and regulations.

Why these credentials matter: CFA® charterholders complete 900+ hours of rigorous study in investment analysis and ethics. CFP® professionals are held to the highest standards of financial planning competency and fiduciary duty in Canada.

📊 Data AccuracyVerified sources
🇨🇦 Canadian FocusLocal expertise
🔍 Fact-CheckedEditorial review

⚠️ Professional Disclaimer

This content is for educational purposes only and should not be considered personalized financial advice. While our team brings professional expertise, individual circumstances vary. For personalized guidance, consult with a qualified financial advisor, tax professional, or mortgage specialist.

Published: November 3, 2026
Last Updated: November 3, 2026

Core portfolio

Awesome Portfolio™

14.8% a year since 2017, against 9.7% for the S&P/TSX Composite. Ten stocks, easy to manage. We update it once a month.

Annualized

+14.8%

Awesome Portfolio™

+9.7%

S&P/TSX

+5.0 pp better a year

Total return

+254%

Awesome Portfolio™

+134%

S&P/TSX

+119 pp better than the TSX

2017-07-31 to 2026-09-29, dividends reinvested, before fees and tax.

Awesome Portfolio™S&P/TSX CompositeCumulative return · 2017-07-31–2026-09-29
-11.7%42.5%96.7%150.9%205.1%259.3%Jul 17Oct 19Feb 22Jun 24Sep 26