TSX open
Loading markets…
Investing

FNV vs K: which stock is the better value?

By Wealth Awesome -
Stocks & ETFs:FNV.TOK.TO

Follow FNV

Photos provided by Pexels

Kinross Gold screens cheaper than Franco-Nevada on all three valuation measures in this snapshot. That’s a comparison of the available figures, not proof that Kinross is undervalued or the better investment.

Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV.TO) and Kinross Gold Corp (K.TO) are both in the Materials sector. But their valuations differ. At the October 30, 2026 adjusted close, Franco-Nevada traded at C$314.41 per share, with a market cap of C$60.6 billion. Kinross traded at C$28.16 per share, with a market cap of C$33.2 billion. Kinross had the lower P/E, PEG and P/B ratios, while Franco-Nevada had the higher dividend yield. These figures offer a starting point, but they don’t explain the gap or show which stock is a better fit.

Investor takeaway: Kinross has lower P/E, PEG and P/B ratios, and higher TTM ROE. Franco-Nevada has the higher dividend yield. These figures describe different aspects of each company. They don’t show that the stock with lower multiples is undervalued, safer or more likely to perform well. The supplied table gives both companies a Strong Sell analyst consensus label and a C$0.00 target. Treat these as snapshot entries, not a substitute for understanding the businesses.

Stocks in this list

Live snapshots — open any name for the full quote and Wealth Awesome price forecast.

Kinross is lower on all three supplied valuation multiples

Kinross has a P/E of 7.2, compared with 28.9 for Franco-Nevada. Its PEG is 1.12 versus 9.18, and its P/B is 2.37 versus 5.24. So Kinross is cheaper on the measures provided. That doesn’t prove the shares are undervalued or that the companies have similar prospects.

Bull case

Kinross has lower P/E, PEG and P/B ratios, along with higher TTM ROE. On these measures, it looks cheaper than Franco-Nevada. But the figures alone don’t show whether the valuation gap is justified.

Bear case

Kinross’s lower multiples may reflect risks or expectations that this snapshot doesn’t capture. Its dividend yield is also lower than Franco-Nevada’s, and the figures don’t explain why.

Kinross screens cheaper on the available multiples

Kinross is below Franco-Nevada on all three valuation measures in the snapshot. Its P/E is 7.2, compared with 28.9 for Franco-Nevada. Its PEG is 1.12 versus 9.18, and its P/B is 2.37 versus 5.24. By these measures, Kinross looks cheaper. But the comparison doesn’t explain the difference, show whether either stock is attractively valued, or establish that the companies have similar prospects. For company details, see Franco-Nevada’s stock page and Kinross Gold’s stock page.

Returns and dividends add context

Kinross reports TTM ROE of 35.3%, compared with 19.9% for Franco-Nevada. Franco-Nevada has the higher dividend yield: 0.51% versus 0.13% for Kinross. These figures highlight differences between the companies, but don’t show their full financial positions or predict future results. The snapshot lists a Strong Sell consensus label and a C$0.00 analyst target for each stock. Treat these as table entries, not as a price outlook.

What the comparison can tell you

The available multiples make Kinross look cheaper, while Franco-Nevada has the higher dividend yield. Neither point makes one stock the winner. Valuation ratios are only part of the picture, and a lower multiple doesn’t prove better value. The snapshot also doesn’t explain why the gap exists. Use these figures to guide further research, while keeping the limits of this comparison in mind.

Wealth Awesome
Written by

Wealth Awesome

Timely coverage of Canadian stocks, earnings, dividends, and market movers for DIY investors. Stories are checked against exchange data and public filings.

View Full Profile →

✅ Reviewed by Certified Financial Professionals

This content has been reviewed by CFA® charterholders and Certified Financial Planners (CFP®) with over a decade of experience in Canadian financial markets. All information is fact-checked against official Canadian sources and regulations.

Why these credentials matter: CFA® charterholders complete 900+ hours of rigorous study in investment analysis and ethics. CFP® professionals are held to the highest standards of financial planning competency and fiduciary duty in Canada.

📊 Data AccuracyVerified sources
🇨🇦 Canadian FocusLocal expertise
🔍 Fact-CheckedEditorial review

⚠️ Professional Disclaimer

This content is for educational purposes only and should not be considered personalized financial advice. While our team brings professional expertise, individual circumstances vary. For personalized guidance, consult with a qualified financial advisor, tax professional, or mortgage specialist.

Published: November 2, 2026
Last Updated: November 2, 2026

Core portfolio

Awesome Portfolio™

14.8% a year since 2017, against 9.7% for the S&P/TSX Composite. Ten stocks, easy to manage. We update it once a month.

Annualized

+14.8%

Awesome Portfolio™

+9.7%

S&P/TSX

+5.0 pp better a year

Total return

+254%

Awesome Portfolio™

+134%

S&P/TSX

+119 pp better than the TSX

2017-07-31 to 2026-09-29, dividends reinvested, before fees and tax.

Awesome Portfolio™S&P/TSX CompositeCumulative return · 2017-07-31–2026-09-29
-11.7%42.5%96.7%150.9%205.1%259.3%Jul 17Oct 19Feb 22Jun 24Sep 26