TSX open
Loading markets…
Investing

FNV vs K: which stock is the better value?

By Wealth Awesome -
Stocks & ETFs:FNV.TOK.TO

Follow FNV

Photos provided by Pexels

Kinross Gold has lower reported valuation multiples than Franco-Nevada across all three measures in this snapshot. That makes it the lower-multiple stock, but it doesn’t tell us which one offers better value.

Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV.TO) and Kinross Gold Corp. (K.TO) are both in the Materials sector, but their valuation multiples differ sharply. At the November 6, 2026 adjusted close, Franco-Nevada traded at C$360.24 per share, with a market cap of C$69.5 billion. Kinross traded at C$31.36 per share, with a market cap of C$36.9 billion. Share prices alone don’t show which company is cheaper. Based on the supplied P/E, PEG and P/B figures, Kinross has the lower multiple in each case. These figures are a starting point, not a full assessment of either company’s business, risks or future returns.

Investor takeaway: Kinross has lower reported P/E, PEG and P/B multiples. It also has higher trailing-twelve-month ROE and a slightly higher dividend yield in this snapshot. That doesn’t prove Kinross is undervalued or Franco-Nevada is overvalued. The figures don’t explain the valuation gap, and the analyst data shown here offers no useful price target for either company.

Stocks in this list

Live snapshots — open any name for the full quote and Wealth Awesome price forecast.

Kinross has the lower figure on all three supplied multiples

Kinross reports a P/E of 8.9, compared with 34.9 for Franco-Nevada. Its PEG is 1.12 versus 9.18, and its P/B is 2.64 versus 6.00. These figures show which stock has lower reported multiples. They don’t establish either company’s intrinsic value or predict its performance.

Bull case

Kinross combines lower reported multiples with 35.3% trailing-twelve-month ROE and a 0.53% dividend yield. Those figures may appeal to investors comparing the two companies, but they don’t show that the valuation gap will close.

Bear case

Lower multiples can reflect risks or expectations that these figures don’t capture. This snapshot alone can’t show whether Kinross’s P/E, PEG and P/B make it a bargain. The supplied analyst target of C$0.00 also offers no useful valuation context.

The valuation snapshot

Kinross has the lower reported figure on all three supplied multiples.

CompanyP/EPEGP/B
Franco-Nevada34.99.186.00
Kinross Gold8.91.122.64

This compares reported multiples; it doesn’t determine fair value. The snapshot doesn’t include the assumptions behind the PEG figures or enough detail to explain why the market values the companies differently.

Other figures add context, not a conclusion

Kinross reports trailing-twelve-month ROE of 35.3%, compared with 19.9% for Franco-Nevada. Its dividend yield is 0.53%, versus 0.47%. Both companies have a Strong Sell analyst consensus in this snapshot, and both show an analyst target of C$0.00. Those figures don’t provide a useful target-price comparison. Kinross has a market cap of C$36.9 billion, compared with C$69.5 billion for Franco-Nevada. Together, these numbers show how the companies differ in this snapshot, but they don’t establish which is the better investment.

Wealth Awesome
Written by

Wealth Awesome

Timely coverage of Canadian stocks, earnings, dividends, and market movers for DIY investors. Stories are checked against exchange data and public filings.

View Full Profile →

✅ Reviewed by Certified Financial Professionals

This content has been reviewed by CFA® charterholders and Certified Financial Planners (CFP®) with over a decade of experience in Canadian financial markets. All information is fact-checked against official Canadian sources and regulations.

Why these credentials matter: CFA® charterholders complete 900+ hours of rigorous study in investment analysis and ethics. CFP® professionals are held to the highest standards of financial planning competency and fiduciary duty in Canada.

📊 Data AccuracyVerified sources
🇨🇦 Canadian FocusLocal expertise
🔍 Fact-CheckedEditorial review

⚠️ Professional Disclaimer

This content is for educational purposes only and should not be considered personalized financial advice. While our team brings professional expertise, individual circumstances vary. For personalized guidance, consult with a qualified financial advisor, tax professional, or mortgage specialist.

Published: November 9, 2026
Last Updated: November 9, 2026

Core portfolio

Awesome Portfolio™

14.8% a year since 2017, against 9.7% for the S&P/TSX Composite. Ten stocks, easy to manage. We update it once a month.

Annualized

+14.8%

Awesome Portfolio™

+9.7%

S&P/TSX

+5.0 pp better a year

Total return

+254%

Awesome Portfolio™

+134%

S&P/TSX

+119 pp better than the TSX

2017-07-31 to 2026-09-29, dividends reinvested, before fees and tax.

Awesome Portfolio™S&P/TSX CompositeCumulative return · 2017-07-31–2026-09-29
-11.7%42.5%96.7%150.9%205.1%259.3%Jul 17Oct 19Feb 22Jun 24Sep 26