TSX open
Loading markets…
Investing

SWKS vs LSCC: which stock is the better value?

By Wealth Awesome -
Stocks & ETFs:SWKS.USLSCC.US

Follow SWKS

Photos provided by Pexels

Skyworks Solutions looks cheaper on two of the three valuation measures in this snapshot. Lattice Semiconductor has the lower PEG, so the comparison is mixed.

Skyworks Solutions Inc. (SWKS) and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) are both in the Information Technology sector and the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group. Their latest adjusted closes were US$82.92 and US$107.25, respectively, on 2026-11-04. Their P/E, PEG and P/B ratios point in different directions. These figures are a starting point for comparison, not a complete verdict on either company.

Investor takeaway: Skyworks has the lower P/E and P/B, while Lattice has the lower PEG. Skyworks looks cheaper on two of the three supplied measures, but that alone doesn’t show it’s undervalued or the better investment. The ratios don’t capture all differences in growth expectations, business prospects or risk.

Stocks in this list

Live snapshots — open any name for the full quote and Wealth Awesome price forecast.

Skyworks is lower on two of three multiples

SWKS has a P/E of 43.0, compared with 346.0 for LSCC. Its P/B is 2.17, versus 10.66 for Lattice. But Lattice has the lower PEG: 0.59 compared with 1.76 for Skyworks. The measures give a mixed picture. Skyworks looks cheaper on two of the three, but that doesn’t establish its intrinsic value.

Bull case

Skyworks’ lower P/E and P/B make it the cheaper-looking stock in this snapshot. Its higher PEG, though, means the valuation picture isn’t uniformly in its favour.

Bear case

Skyworks has a 5.1% ROE TTM and a 0.00% dividend yield in the snapshot. Along with its higher PEG, these figures add context for assessing its lower multiples. They don’t, on their own, make the stock a buy or a stock to avoid.

The valuation table is split

Skyworks has the lower P/E: 43.0, compared with 346.0 for Lattice. Its P/B is also lower, at 2.17 versus 10.66. Lattice has the lower PEG, at 0.59 compared with 1.76 for Skyworks. By a simple count, Skyworks looks cheaper on two of the three measures. Lattice’s PEG is an important counterpoint, and these ratios measure different things.

MeasureSkyworks (SWKS)Lattice (LSCC)
P/E43.0346.0
PEG1.760.59
P/B2.1710.66

A lower multiple doesn’t prove a stock is undervalued, just as a higher one doesn’t prove it’s overpriced. These figures don’t show the assumptions behind the ratios or account for every factor that could affect future results. You can review the company pages for Skyworks Solutions and Lattice Semiconductor as part of your research.

Company figures add context, not a verdict

Skyworks has a market cap of US$19.5B and ROE TTM of 5.1%. Lattice has a market cap of US$15.2B and ROE TTM of 4.2%. Both have a dividend yield of 0.00%. The snapshot lists an analyst consensus of Hold and a target of US$80.06 for Skyworks, compared with Strong Buy and US$156.19 for Lattice. These are the snapshot’s labels and targets, not a substitute for comparing the companies or a promise of future performance.

The last adjusted closes, dated 2026-11-04, were US$82.92 for Skyworks and US$107.25 for Lattice. The figures show why one multiple can’t settle the comparison: Skyworks has the lower P/E and P/B, while Lattice has the lower PEG and different analyst figures. Use the snapshot to guide further research, not to decide on its own which stock offers better value.

Wealth Awesome
Written by

Wealth Awesome

Timely coverage of Canadian stocks, earnings, dividends, and market movers for DIY investors. Stories are checked against exchange data and public filings.

View Full Profile →

✅ Reviewed by Certified Financial Professionals

This content has been reviewed by CFA® charterholders and Certified Financial Planners (CFP®) with over a decade of experience in Canadian financial markets. All information is fact-checked against official Canadian sources and regulations.

Why these credentials matter: CFA® charterholders complete 900+ hours of rigorous study in investment analysis and ethics. CFP® professionals are held to the highest standards of financial planning competency and fiduciary duty in Canada.

📊 Data AccuracyVerified sources
🇨🇦 Canadian FocusLocal expertise
🔍 Fact-CheckedEditorial review

⚠️ Professional Disclaimer

This content is for educational purposes only and should not be considered personalized financial advice. While our team brings professional expertise, individual circumstances vary. For personalized guidance, consult with a qualified financial advisor, tax professional, or mortgage specialist.

Published: November 5, 2026
Last Updated: November 5, 2026

Core portfolio

Awesome Portfolio™

14.8% a year since 2017, against 9.7% for the S&P/TSX Composite. Ten stocks, easy to manage. We update it once a month.

Annualized

+14.8%

Awesome Portfolio™

+9.7%

S&P/TSX

+5.0 pp better a year

Total return

+254%

Awesome Portfolio™

+134%

S&P/TSX

+119 pp better than the TSX

2017-07-31 to 2026-09-29, dividends reinvested, before fees and tax.

Awesome Portfolio™S&P/TSX CompositeCumulative return · 2017-07-31–2026-09-29
-11.7%42.5%96.7%150.9%205.1%259.3%Jul 17Oct 19Feb 22Jun 24Sep 26